Skip to content

X-Men: First Class Is Pretty, But Inconsistent

June 7, 2011

X-Men: First Class is the latest prequel to the the famous comic strip-turned-film series from Marvel. The movie tells the story of Professor X and Magneto before they were Professor X and Magneto, working with other mutants to develop their abilities. As such, the film features a completely different, younger cast, with big shoes to fill.

As a stand-alone film, First Class was entertaining because the effects were visually appealing, the period pieces were accurate, and the plot was compelling. As a prequel to the X-Men saga, however, it fell short. The film had good tie-ins to the other installments in the series – I liked Hugh Jackman’s cameo and the origins of the X-Men’s SR-71 and Magneto’s telepathy-proof helmet – but poor overall continuity.  Having seen the other live-action X-Men films, I could not overlook the enormous number of plot discrepancies between this prequel and the other movies.  X-Men has fallen into the same prequel trap as Star WarsFirst Class ensures that the story lines match up merely from a plot perspective – Magneto and Xavier need to have a falling out, Xavier must eventually become paralyzed, etc. –  but muddled and confused motivations and personal histories that the other films had already defined. In X-Men, Xavier has clearly never seen Mystique before and needs to discover her ability to change forms, but First Class has them growing up together.  In X-Men: The Last Stand, Magneto and Xavier meet Jean Grey in the 1980s together (with Xavier walking), but First Class has their separation and paralyzation occurring in the 1960s.  (Then again, X-Men: Origins had the continuity problem well in hand by having Wolverine meet a majority of the characters who acted like they had never met him in the first movie).  If you’re going to make a prequel, could you at least bother to take the time to re-watch the other movies first?

I found myself in a love-hate relationship with this film.  Some the new characters were engaging and likable – Beast (Nicholas Hoult) was phenomenal in the way he made the character come to life, and Magneto (Michael Fassbender) played out his transformation well.  At the same time, Emma Frost (January Jones), who also made an appearance in X-Men: Origins, would perhaps have been better off playing a mutant who could turn into wood.

I also feel as though the director didn’t fully understand the relationships between familiar characters and didn’t have a grasp of some of the characters we’ve known since the original X-Men.  To fans, who have been privy to the old and strained friendship between Prof. Xavier and Magneto thanks to the first three films, this prequel’s interpretation came as a shock.  Confrontational conversations, chess games, and prison visits have shown these two men to be friends who, despite having view-points at opposite ends of the spectrum, still strive to work together and change each others’ minds.  First Class tried to mimic this friendship, but contained odd moments where it seemed as though Xavier was mentoring Magneto as a teacher rather than giving concerned advice as a friend.  While this behavior is understandable for his initial “students,” it felt wrong being applied to someone who has always been portrayed as his equal.

A scene I continue thinking back to when judging this film was when a young Magneto first uses his powers.  It begins by redoing the wonderfully directed opening scene of X2: X-Men United, where Magneto tears down a gate in a Polish concentration camp.  However, that section is the only part of the scene I like, which I think is due to the original director.  This film added a Frankenstein-esque plot line by fitting Dr. Shaw into Magneto’s backstory to become his “creator.”  The scene then shifts to Magneto in the office of a Nazi doctor, trying to move a metal coin.  The scene ends with the young Magneto going out of control crazy and destroying everything metal in the office.  But, for a two minute expression of rage, young Magneto (Bill Milner) appears to be only putting on a mask of anger with no real feeling behind it.  The anger this scene evokes in him is the driving point of his character, and as such, this moment should come to define his every action and thought.  Partly, it does just that, through Magneto’s actions; however, his dialogue does not follow.  If he knew Sebastian Shaw as Dr. Schmidt, he would call him that despite the CIA referring to him as Shaw, because he only sees the man as the Doctor who took everything away from him.

On its own, I enjoyed how First Class revolved its plot around the events of the 1960s – the Russians, WWIII, and the Cuban Missile Crisis – in an attention-grabbing story.  It was a good film in and of itself and partially accomplished the goals of a prequel by providing more in-depth exposition to the existing series.  However, X-Men fans may not like its continuity problems and the inexperience of new actors playing familiar characters.

Image via.

37 Comments leave one →
  1. Guest11111 permalink
    June 10, 2011 9:37 pm

    Absolutely correct.

    You would think that the writer/Director of the first two movies would take a stand as the prequel’s producer, but hey, what do I expect from Bryan Singer. I mean this is the guy who ignored Superman III and IV when he made Superman Returns. If you don’t like a movie you do a complete rework, ala Batman Begins/The Dark Knight. You don’t just ignore certain key facts like character relationships. Every director/writer/producer decides to try and make their movie THE movie despite the work of others (or in this case their own previous work). I personally don’t understand why continuity is such a hard concept, it seems like it is a bit of laziness (or ineptitude) on the part of the creative staff and Hollywood studios. if you are going to capitalize on the name of something (Superman, X-Men, whatever), if you are going to build on that then BUILD on it, don’t cast it aside.
    However, it was a good movie; Singer and the studio got what they wanted (my money to see the film) so I doubt they care about any of the rest of this. (Well, of course they don’t –you can’t tell me that Singer didn’t know there was continuity issues).

    Now, they could make a sequel to this (another prequel) in which the fall out is not complete but rather just the first beginning stage—kind of a love/hate/ respect relationship between X and Magneto. professor X’s injury could be explained as gradually getting worse. As far as the Mystic relationship goes, I don’t know, I’d have to go back and watch the original (something Singer and the others should have done–and cared about). The Wolverine relationship doesn’t bother me, its Wolverine who has the memory loss, and Xavier keeps things from people as seen with Jene Gray. But will they make this movie, probably not, if there is a sequel it will probably just exploit the continuity issues or create new ones.

  2. smh permalink
    June 20, 2011 1:57 am

    …you’re actually stupid lmfao, if you had any sort of knowledge about this Marvel universe then you’d know that these movies are not meant to link in any manner. First class is in it’s own stream, apart from the original three live x-men films, as well as the origin series. What you’re complaining about is only valid if I were to imagine that the movies came before the comics and their intricate back stories. If you’re going to complain about something being inconsistent at least know the reason as to why it is. I suggest you use http://www.google.com next time you want to hate on a film’s inconsistencies before actually doing so. A bit of research could help stop you from presenting yourself as a stupid and/or lazy non-mutant. Unless your ability is the ability of dumbassness. Then kudos. You must be a level 5 for sure!

    Sincerely,
    Pwned

  3. a "true" x-men fan permalink
    June 23, 2011 1:00 am

    smh got it right. x-men:first class was not even placed in the same continuum; if you want to accurately critique a movie, develop a critique based on facts and not your shitty knit-picky opinions. obviously you’re wearing a helmet similar to magneto’s, except it seems to block any logical receptiveness in your case. The concentration camp scene was not to show a “continuity” between first class and the original films; it is the universal background to magneto’s power, and is used universally exclusively to bring to the forefront his jewish heritage, “Too long have I suffered at the hands of those just following orders. Never again.” please. for future reference, research before you call yourself a fan and embarrass yourself.

    – sincerely, a “true” fan.

    P.S. though the original 3 starwars movies were amazing, your analysis of the 3 prequels was also shit. seriously. Like… no lie.

  4. Lauren Walters permalink
    June 23, 2011 1:15 am

    @Smh (aka “true” x-men fan) –
    It is fine if you would like to leave two comments on this post but if you are going to do so, we ask that you not pretend to be two different people and then address the other in your comment to further back up your argument.
    Thanks,
    Lauren Walters, EIC

    Pro-Tip: Don’t use the same computer and the same email address when leaving comments if you’re pretending to be someone else.

  5. Darren Russell permalink
    June 25, 2011 7:13 am

    ” It begins by redoing the wonderfully directed opening scene of X2: X-Men United, where Magneto tears down a gate in a Polish concentration camp.”

    I’m sorry but doesn’t that happen in the first X-Men not the second?
    Also I thought that X-Men: First Class was to act as a reboot of sorts?

  6. matt permalink
    June 30, 2011 12:20 pm

    It obviously tried to keep some continuty otherwise it would not have had hugh jackman. it would not have used the gate scene. It would not have used the helmet. I think they just said “f” it and did what ever would seem cool. I’m sure they took everything into consideration and just did what they thought would make the best movie and most money. which it was that a great movie. it actually does remind of the way star wars worked.

  7. matt permalink
    June 30, 2011 12:27 pm

    Also apparently cerebro was made by the cia(beast) but magneto in the othermovies states he helped charles build it

  8. will permalink
    July 1, 2011 12:03 pm

    Naw man. I’m with you. Those who say that you are being picky because this movie was not suppose to follow the others- that would be right… if it were true. I think Wolverines cameo solidified that. The action of the movie was okay but what is the point of having xavier and Magnito be friends for (what was it?), six months? not much of a friendship. It was just an okay movie.

  9. beaver permalink
    July 8, 2011 11:02 pm

    If they didn’t want people having problems with the continuity of this movie, then they should not have used the same mansion, the same wolverine, the same scene from the beginning of the first x-men movie, etc. If you are going to reboot a movie, then start from scratch, don’t use the same old stuff from other movies.

  10. Michelle permalink
    July 17, 2011 6:48 pm

    The author of this article got it right. The movies are separate entities from the comics and need to be consistent. First class was a good movie, but I’m mot a comic fan and as a fan of the movies I need to be able to watch without wondering why they changed this or that just to have creative license.

  11. JMan permalink
    July 30, 2011 5:03 pm

    “Polish concentration camp”? Really, has the author lost her mind? Now I am German and I feel obliged to point out that the only concentration camps in existence in the Jew Holocaust were German ones.

    Now the author most surely meant the German concentration camps on occupied Polish territory. But that is a huge difference and calling them Polish concentration camps is what leads numerous people around the world to believe that they actually were “Polish”.

    As for the film (because that is the why I came here in the first place), the inconsistencies are irritating. It is as if the film makers wanted to make connections to the previous films at all costs – like Xaviers paralyzation – instead of just not including them.

  12. MDK_Foz permalink
    August 12, 2011 7:32 pm

    I have watched in all films, there inconsistancies with regards to first class and the other 4 movies, however as it is stated in the 1st comment on here. about origins, wolverine got shot which made him forget about all the other x-men. there is nothing in the other x men to say that they didnt know who wolverine was. but like people have said before me, that first class was just made to show how magneto enhanced and started to use his power.

  13. Ydo permalink
    August 13, 2011 8:05 am

    @smh @a “true” x-men fan
    dude, go to Comic-Con and stay out of theaters, cause clearly you dont understand how movies work.

    @JMan
    patato potato, obviously he means a concentration camp situated in German occupied Poland, do you really have such big inheritance problems?!?!

    @the rest
    overall a fun movie to watch but I just got bothered by those tiny details called discrepancies between movies
    just 1 thing that bothered me all these years is, why the “f” did the writer put in the mutant level system, that was such a bummer so I turned the last movie off and continued to watch it a day later. can someone explain why this is and please dont say: cause the comic said so

  14. Cash Men permalink
    September 11, 2011 2:06 am

    Clearly its a continuation – and it doesn’t match up.

    I think the creators of First Class are operating under the assumption that the majority of people who will watch this movie won’t have seen all the others. Only the die hard fans will notice the discrepancy.

    Actually I have seen all the movies and I can’t say that while watching First Class I noticed any problems… but I pulled out the DVD’s and decided to watch the others again… and only then did I realise it didn’t line up.

    Its actually 11 years ago if I’m correct when the first one came out in 2000. Then the next in 2003 and the next in 2006, then 2009.

    For a vast majority of viewers, First Class will ignite an interest in the other 3 movies and reignite sales. By the time discrepancies are found, a new wave of sales has come through and it doesn’t matter if there is continuation or not – movie makers make cash.

  15. Chris permalink
    September 15, 2011 2:55 am

    I really enjoyed First Class. I thought that it was supposed to work as a prequel, but also of a reboot of sorts, in the same way that Casino Royale was both a prequel and a reboot of the James Bond series. I noticed that some people said that it could not have been a reboot because of the Wolverine cameo, but isn’t that the same principle they used in Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace with Judi Dench playing “M”?

    The thing I noticed right away was that Xavier’s injury did not match up with the fact that he could walk in Origins and The Last Stand, while clearly being older in both of these movies. I really like the way they went with the injury though, that it was Erik’s fault, and I think they could build on that in the sequels to solidify the relationship between Erik and Xavier. Obviously Mistique’s relationship with Xavier leans toward me saying that this is a reboot rather than a prequel. Another major continuity problem I noticed was that Havoc was Alex Summers (just like in the comics) who is Scott Summers’ YOUNGER brother. Clearly something’s a little off seeing as the Scott Summers in Origins and the trilogy would be much much older than both Erik and Xavier if First Class was supposed to follow a continuum, which makes me lean heavily toward the idea that it was intended to be a reboot, much like Casino Royale or Batman Begins.

    And @smh/a “true” x-men fan:

    Lol forever. Seriously. That shit’s funny. You gotta do a little better than that to make people think you aren’t the same person. I think I’m going to do the same thing as you, write a second post praising myself and my views just in case no one agrees with me.

  16. A hot girl permalink
    September 15, 2011 3:04 am

    @Chris is totally right. He is a god among men. Everything he said is absolutely true. And he probably has a large penis.

    Also, @JMan…

    Everyone knows the Germans were the bad guys. I doubt anybody assumed that the Polish ran their own concentration camps. My 5-year old sister could figure out that “Polish concentration camps” means a German concentration camp located in Poland. But it totally seems normal that you wouldn’t want “those dirty Polacks” to get the credit for running concentration camps when it’s clearly something the Germans today would want to take credit for. Kudos.

  17. Jonathan Landén permalink
    October 3, 2011 6:34 pm

    Unfortunately I couldn’t enjoy the movie as I saw the other movies (again) a day before this movie. I understand that the majority of the viewers is not hardcore fans, but that doesn’t mean that the director couldn’t build more on the explaining of new mutants and their recently explored abilities and create a new well written trilogy that includes the building of Cerebro (the one that Xavier has in his school/mansion) the split up between Magneto and Xavier (not a fight on the beach).

    I thought this movie was called First Class for one reason, to see the original X-Men explore and try to controll their powers, to later become powerful mutants, but of course not mashed into one single movie.

    I know that if this was the first X-Men movie I saw, I would be eager to see the remaining four films, but as I have seen the other movies I feel very dissapointed to have witnessed someone destroy the chance of a new awesome trilogy.

  18. an actually hot girl permalink
    October 12, 2011 6:18 pm

    @Chris hahahahaaaa!! soo hilarious and i completely agree with u!!

  19. Derek permalink
    October 22, 2011 7:12 am

    Interesting comments on the movie if I might say, yes some continuity is left changed from flashbacks of original trilogy and some changes made from even the ties to Origins: Wolverine. An idea I have always thought and if a possible explanation is that the clips in original trilogy just that mere flashbacks, attempting to remember events in the past of adults when they were young. With that it is possible, even with Xavier mutant telepathic mind to remember events not quite the way they happened. This can lead to actual events taken place differently then memories or flashbacks. That is part of being human no matter how large your mental capacity. These movies are a audio/visual storytelling of an approximate timeline. There is a chance Xavier was paralyzed in 1962 but it was such a devastating thing to happen to him certain memories may have been pushed back and altered based on how he would perceive them as an older prof X. A reboot it may be, like Chris stated, is plausible. All in all I think it was a well made movie and to me it does link to other ones even with the differences.

  20. Jeremy permalink
    October 27, 2011 10:57 pm

    If it was intended as a reboot, then not only should they not have Hugh Jackman in a cameo as the same character he previously played, or Magneto and Xavier become enemies before meeting Jean Grey or any of the other multitudes of inconsistencies… but also, they shouldn’t have included Magneto’s sound effects, nor the same teleportation visual effects and most of all, they shouldn’t have made Mystique look and change exactly like she does in the previous movies. If you do a reboot, you do not inherit any effects, nor any identical visual styles. I didn’t like Batman Begins but at least *that* Batman was sufficiently different from the 90’s version, and that goes double for the Batmobile, which I especially didn’t like.

  21. Leigh permalink
    November 17, 2011 8:43 am

    I have to applaude your comments! I am an ardent X-Men. Fan so could not wait to see Lfirst class” but found myself annoyed with the inconsistancies!

  22. Emily permalink
    November 27, 2011 1:43 am

    I don’t understand why everyone keeps referring to the author of this post as a “he”, it clearly states “by Katie Holliday”. Not a big deal or anything, but reading through the comments, it bugged me. Anyways props to you girl, I agree with you completely. I only recently watched “X-men: Origins” but before that I watched all the others including “First Class”. What brought me here was exactly the inconsistency of the movie, but until I read this post and the comments, I didn’t realize I missed so many key inaccuracies. Embarrassing enough the thing that stood out to me the most was how in “First Class”, Emma Frost and Xavier were about the same age but near the end of “X-men: Origins”, it shows a young teenage Emma Frost boarding a helicopter with a very bald, legs kicking Xavier. This really is the smallest detail compared to other inconsistencies others have listed above. But I’m the kind of person when critiquing a film, needs to find someone else in the world who’s noticed the same mistakes as I have, just so I can say “YES. EXACTLY. This person gets me”. Unfortunately nobody mentioned this anywhere up there, so I’m just going to go a head and do it myself in case someone else with no life wonders the net looking for this exact thing. If this someone else is you and you’re reading this right now with satisfaction, I think we’re soul mates..

    Anyways, back to the film. It was intended as a prequel. C’mon people lets be realistic.

  23. Spencer permalink
    December 20, 2011 12:24 am

    Although I agree with much of what you have said, the paralysis issue is nothing to worry about, as far as I know if you take a deep look into the comics you might find that they temporarily cured Xaviers paralysis. the part about Xavier being a teacher rather than just a friend not only goes along with his later chosen proffesion but it comes to the fact that Erik needed guidance in order to fully unlock and develop his power

  24. Mr Plot Hole permalink
    January 1, 2012 2:34 am

    Very much enjoyed reading these comments! while i am not an x-men fan by any account i have seen the movies and by the casting in FC i assumed it was a prequel. HOWEVER! as far as plot holes are concerned, how the hell did they make it off the beach at the end of the film??? Ok so the “bad” mutants teleported off, simple… and i can understand the navies hesitation to fire more rockets but if we are to take into account that both USSR and USA governments wished them all dead… how did Charles and the others left survive? how did they get back to the mainland without being attacked by the government? how did the government allow Charles to return to his academy and continue his mentoring if the governments decided then and there to wipe them out!? Surely if Charles was as smart as hes portrayed in the films he would know he was returning to a country that wished him dead right? Did nobody else pick up on this? Am i supposed to believe that they, er… changed their minds?

    RANT OVER.

  25. nate r permalink
    January 13, 2012 11:41 pm

    In the old x men movies magneto says he helped xavier build cerebro, but hank builds it in this one, how do u mess that one up?

  26. Terry Allen permalink
    January 16, 2012 4:44 am

    I’m a fan of the comics and the movies. Now, I have noticed the continuity errors but the new first class trilogy is supposed to lead into the original, they have 2 more movies to correct them and in origins and x3 those flashbacks are what they are, there are continuity errors, but you can’t let it bother you too much because these x-men movies are great and you might be over thinking it, so many people like these movies, but you focus on what’s wrong with these movies so much, that you forget whats
    right with them and I don’t get the x3 hate,
    everything in that movie was a reference to an x-
    men comic Wtf? They’re just small errors that I
    can forgive and if you can forgive them too you might actually enjoy all 5 x-films instead of complaining about every little thing

  27. February 27, 2012 9:46 am

    Stumbled on this page on a search and I have to say I agree completely with everything you said. Also when you look at it in comparison to the original films, it makes Magneto seem less of a character because he’s essentially just turned into a shadow of Shaw. More than that, the idea of Sebastian Shaw as a mutant supremacist is pretty ridiculous when in the comics, he’s simply a power-hungry opportunist who has no qualms about attacking mutants or humans for his own benefit (his company constructs the mutant-hunting Sentinels).

    I think the problem is that the producers weren’t really sure what it was they were doing. Singer has said that First Class is a prequel, but I’ve read comments from other producers saying that it’s a reboot.

    More than the continuity errors, more than Shaw’s ridiculously stupid plot of “nuke the world and see what happens,” more than the choices of characters for the so-called “first class,” what irritates me the most about this movie is that it has so much promise. Vaughn is an incredible director, anyone who has seen this or any of his other films can definitely attest to that. The problem is that it just doesn’t feel like the filmmakers really cared about making an accurate prequel. They just thought, “hey, MLK and Malcolm X were around in the 60s, the X-Men comic launched in the 60s, the Cuban Missile Crisis happened in the 60s, so let’s make an X-Men movie in the 60s.” It was a half-baked idea that was not properly developed.

  28. Tye, permalink
    March 15, 2012 1:35 am

    I liked ur post it was correct n many ways n i was like i feel the exact same way

  29. April 3, 2012 11:45 pm

    Here’s the REAL problem:

    The X-Men movie rights are currently held by 20th Century Fox, and NOT Marvel Studios. If Marvel Studios were making it, you’d see extremely close attention to continuity and detail. However, since the film rights are held by Fox, what you’re seeing is the exploitation of the Intellectual Property for the sole purpose of merchandising. Nobody at Fox gives a damn about continuity with the previous films, the integrity of the characters, or holding with comic book ideals. All they wanted were the ideas, names, and basic premise to use for their own story.

    In fact, I would be willing to bet that the screenplay for X-Men: First Class started life as a screenplay for some other completely different tale of the Cuban Missile Crisis, and that the character names, powers, and basic X-Men ideas were crammed into the story sideways to make a marketable film out of it.

    The producers don’t give a damn what so-and-so’s origin, powers, look, or anything else were like in the comics. All they wanted were the names, basic ideas for the characters, and other recognizable staples that they could slap on a trailer & poster in order to get suckers to pay $10 to see it in theaters.

    When are people going to learn the lesson that –Marvel characters who are being handled by movie studios other than Disney/Marvel Studios are going to be severely compromised, mined for their marketability, and transformed to match the producers and director’s “vision”. When are people going to stop plunking down their cash to watch Fox mangle the X-Men, or Sony mangle Spider-Man? When are people going to FINALLY give Fox and Sony a reason to sell the film rights for Marvel Comics characters back to Marvel Studios, where they can get a proper treatment and become part of the bigger Marvel Movie Universe?

    Every time you pay to see an X-Men film produced by Fox, you’re making it worth their while to pick the bones of this franchise and keep the film rights.

    Fox and Sony really don’t give a damn about continuity or loyalty to source material. All they care about is that the name recognition will make gullible people continue to pay to see their drek, as long as they make the posters and trailers look “cool”.

    YOU made this possible. STOP PAYING FOX AND SONY TO MANGLE MARVEL CHARACTERS and you might start seeing some decent versions of those characters.

  30. EBZ permalink
    May 20, 2012 3:02 am

    Amen Ke. Amen.
    That is why the Avengers films and precursory films, excluding Thor–what was that about, were far better received by the true fans.

  31. Jordan Roberts permalink
    June 10, 2012 3:39 am

    I know it threw me off too. However, do you think this film is a reboot to a whole another series such as Batman with Christopher Nolan? I have a hard time believing this director accidently mest up these inconsistancy. Sounds like a reboot to me..

  32. June 10, 2012 8:33 am

    There’s the rub, Jordan — no one really knows. I believe Schuler-Donner (one of the producers) said it was a reboot, but Singer (another producer) said it was a prequel. If it was a straight-up reboot, why go with such an oddball team instead of the original five and why reference things from the original series of films? And if it was a prequel, why all the inconsistencies?

  33. Don't care permalink
    June 19, 2012 7:01 pm

    Hahahaha super nerds! Look you didn’t pwn anybody you just showed that you are a super nerd and have no other life than “pwning” someone who was just making a point that the directors and producers were inconsistant in the Movies no one mentioned anything about the comics. If the make movies that involve back stories they should be consistent, end of story.

  34. Disappointed fan permalink
    July 5, 2012 1:32 am

    I agree with much that you said but it being the 1960’s it means that Wolverine has not gone through his surgery yet. And if you remember, he loses all of his memory after that therefore that actually works. But things like the professor being shot and such I don’t agree with. Also the age of Striker and Moira are questionable. Unless the Striker in X-men origins and X2 is a different Striker (ie. son or younger brother) but that doesn’t work with professor X saying “hello moira” at the end of The Last Stand” unless that nurse was a totally different person. All in all i believe that Singer leaving the X-men franchise was a complete let down to everyone and the steps that Ratner and other members of X-men 3 The Last Stand took to release the movie before Singer’s “Superman Returns” was released truly killed the franchise and have since not been able to compare to the first two X-Men movies made.

  35. Supel permalink
    September 16, 2012 9:14 am

    How I got here is beyond me so I read some of these idiotic and stupid claims seriously who gives a shit if there were inconsistencys or if it was a reboot or a prequel your all missing the point it’s a movie and it’s entertainment so get a life and enjoy it for what it is if your that upset over it dont watch it seriously

  36. guest20121111 permalink
    November 18, 2012 5:30 pm

    In x-men united while mystique is distracting the guard in the bar the television on the wall shows an interview with ‘Dr. Hank McCoy’. In the interview he has not mutated. In x-men origins he changes as a young man.

  37. Jeremy permalink
    January 22, 2013 12:24 am

    Supel, we care about such things because inconsistencies make an otherwise good film, look very bad, less enjoyable and less believable. We’re supposed to suspend disbelief in sci-fi and super-hero films. Inconsistencies would make this almost impossible. If Hollywood listened to your outlook on films, they’d produce atrocious movies that were complete and utter nonsense, with inconsistencies practically used as a plot device.

Leave a comment